A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning possible neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental concerns, and lengthy-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a local disagreement has evolved into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction functions at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to construct their family members house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming built by their future neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Street, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside a sensitive coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their arranging permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partially constructed, is in the proper position. Their legal crew has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to protect their watch, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are each really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Instances, a picture that has since come to be emblematic with the intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into an area impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached upon.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to even more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital second inside the legal timeline.
In the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about guaranteeing that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the area and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically attempting to make a family property in accordance with the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Location of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea through a storm, never alter the fundamental info.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than construction of wall at coastal website is now a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed the businessman experienced Earlier been involved with regional advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how individuals from incredibly different Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an extreme strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result stays uncertain. The court need to establish if the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Specific Spot of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. Still the human aspect remains central: neighbours who should Are living along with each other long once the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase over and above that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic challenges including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of all-natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin in recent years.